Justia Badge
Dispute Resolution Program
Client's Choice AVVO
Reviews - AVVO
Illinois State Bar
The Florida Bar
U.S. District Court, Colorado
U.S. District Court, Western District of Oklahoma
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit

California Lemon Law Rights Consumer Guide

California Lemon Law Rights

Looking for an easy to understand explanation of your California lemon law rights, including the California lemon law definition and presumptions? If so, you can read this guide and all its helpful hints. And if after you read this guide you have more questions, or you want help from a free California Lemon Law Attorney, click to connect for a free lemon law case review and free lemon law representation! This Guide on the California car lemon law was compiled by the California Office of the Attorney General and is brought to you here courtesy of CarLemon.

California Motor Vehicle Warranty Law and the California Lemon Law Statute

A purchaser or lessee of a motor vehicle has various rights under both state and federal law if the vehicle does not perform as provided under an express warranty. Warranty law can be complex, and it is impossible to describe comprehensively all of the law in a brief space. The following comments briefly explain the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act and what is popularly known as the “California Lemon Law.”

This message is not a substitute for your contacting your own lawyer who can best advise you of your rights under the particular circumstances of your case. The Attorney General’s office cannot advise you of your legal rights and cannot represent you in a warranty dispute.

Coverage for new Motor Vehicles A. Overview of Song-Beverly Warranty Rights: About the California Lemon Law on New Cars

The Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act (beginning with Civil Code section 1790) is the California automobile lemon law and provides protection for consumers who lease or buy new motor vehicles. The law requires that if the manufacturer or its representative in this state, such as an authorized dealer, is unable to service or repair a new motor vehicle to meet the terms of an express written warranty after a reasonable number of repair attempts, the manufacturer is required promptly to replace the vehicle or return the purchase price to the lessee or buyer. The purchase price that must be returned includes the price paid for manufacturer-installed items and transportation but does not include the price paid for non-manufacturer items installed by the dealer. The lessee or buyer is completely free to choose whether to accept a replacement or a refund. Whatever the choice, the manufacturer is also responsible to pay for sales or use tax; license, registration, and other official fees; and incidental damages that the lessee or buyer may have incurred such as finance charges, repair, towing, and rental car costs.

The lessee or buyer may be charged for the use of the vehicle regardless of whether the vehicle is replaced or the purchase price is refunded. The amount that may be charged for use is determined by multiplying the actual price of the new vehicle by a fraction having as its denominator 120,000 and as its numerator the number of miles traveled by the vehicle before it was first brought in for correction of the problem. For example, if the car had traveled 6,000 miles before it was first brought in for correction of the problem, the lessee or buyer could be charged 5% (6,000/120,000 = 5%) of the purchase price for usage.

The law applies for the entire period of your warranty. For example, if your vehicle is covered by a three-year warranty and you discover a defect after two years, the manufacturer will have to replace the vehicle or reimburse you as outlined above if the manufacturer or its representative is unable to conform the vehicle to the express warranty after a reasonable number of attempts to do so.

Song-Beverly does not apply if the problem was caused by abuse after the vehicle was delivered. Be sure you follow the terms of the warranty for maintenance and proper use of the vehicle.

Although there is a four-year statute of limitations to bring a law suit for breach of warranty or for violations of Song-Beverly, you should act promptly to try to resolve the problem fairly and quickly without legal action if possible.

B. The “Lemon Law” and What is a Reasonable Number of Repair Attempts

What is considered a reasonable number of repair attempts will depend on the circumstances including the seriousness of the defect. For example, one or two repair attempts may be considered reasonable for serious safety defects such as brake failure, depending on the exact situation.

A special provision, often called the “Lemon Law,” helps determine what is a reasonable number of repair attempts for problems that substantially impair the use, value, or safety of the vehicle. The “Lemon Law” applies to these problems if they arise during the first 18 months after the consumer received delivery of the vehicle or within the first 18,000 miles on the odometer, whichever occurs first. During the first 18 months or 18,000 miles, the “Lemon Law” presumes that a manufacturer has had a reasonable number of attempts to repair the vehicle if either (1) the manufacturer or its agents have had four or more opportunities to repair the vehicle for the same problem and the consumer has at least once directly notified the manufacturer of the need for repair as provided in the warranty or owner’s manual, or (2) the vehicle is out of service because of the repair of any number of problems by the manufacturer or its agents for a cumulative total of more than 30 days since delivery of the vehicle.

The “Lemon Law” presumption is a guide, not an absolute rule. A judge or arbitrator can assume that the manufacturer has had a reasonable number of chances to repair the vehicle if all of the conditions are met. The manufacturer, however, has the right to try to prove that it should have the chance to attempt additional repairs, and the consumer has the right to show that fewer repair attempts are reasonable under the circumstances.

Be sure to check your warranty and owner’s manual for instructions. You may be required to directly notify the manufacturer of the problem(s). It is a good idea to send your written notice to the manufacturer at the address shown in the warranty or owner’s manual by certified mail, return receipt requested so that you have proof that your letter was received. Keep a copy of all correspondence.

If the manufacturer maintains a state-certified arbitration program, the consumer must submit the warranty dispute to the arbitration program before the consumer can take advantage of the presumption in court. Arbitration is an alternative to court proceedings. The consumer may assert the presumption during arbitration. Information about any arbitration should be described in the warranty or owner’s manual.

Not every manufacturer maintains a state-certified program. You should check with the Department of Consumer Affairs’ Arbitration Review Program at (800) 952-5210 or on the Internet. You can also ask for one of the Department’s free pamphlets that explains more about arbitration, “Lemon-Aid For New Car Buyers.”

C. Who is Covered

The law applies to consumers who bought or leased a motor vehicle primarily for personal, family, or household use. A person who bought or leased a vehicle primarily for business purposes would not be protected under Song-Beverly, but the business person may still have other warranty rights under contract law, the Commercial Code, and federal law that are beyond the scope of this message.

D. What is a New Motor Vehicle

The law discussed above applies to “new motor vehicles.” (Certain limited protection may apply to used vehicles as described in Section 2.) The term “new motor vehicle” includes not only new motor vehicles but also demonstrators; the chassis, chassis cab, and propulsion system of a new motor home; and any other motor vehicle sold with a manufacturer’s new car warranty. For example, a two-year old used car sold with the remaining one year portion of a manufacturer’s three-year new car warranty would be treated as a new motor vehicle. The term “new motor vehicle,” however, does not include motorcycles or exclusively off-road vehicles.

Coverage for Vehicles That are not “new”

Although the special provisions discussed above apply to new motor vehicles, Song-Beverly has many general rules that apply to any consumer product sold with an express written warranty. As a result, there is important coverage for motorcycles, the living quarters of a mobile home, used vehicles sold with a dealer’s express written warranty, “lemon” vehicles repurchased by the manufacturer and sold to consumers with an express written warranty covering the defect, and vehicles sold with a service contract.

A full description of warranty rights is beyond the scope of this message, but you should be aware that coverage is not identical to the coverage for new motor vehicles. For example, a warrantor who is unable to conform a consumer product to its express warranty within a reasonable number of attempts is required to replace the goods or refund the purchase price less an amount attributable to the consumer’s use. Unlike the special rules on new motor vehicles, however, there is no set formula for determining the charge for the consumer’s use before the discovery of the defect, and the Lemon Law presumption does not apply.

Client Reviews
I want to personally thank you for all your assistance and guidance with this. I value everything you did and hope I will not have to use your service, but will highly recommend your office. Diana
I received the payment for my settlement. I really appreciate your firm for the representation. You all did a wonderful job and in the future if I need assistance you will be the first I would call. Thank you and i will make sure that I give you plenty referrals. Thank you again!!! Montreesia R.
Thank you all for your time and dedication to my case. The fact that it was done from another state is astounding. You all did such an awesome job with communication and efficiency. Diamond F.
Thank you for the work you have done. I didn't know what to do, but you did. I appreciate the time you took with me. Thank you again for winning the case. Athenia P.
Mr. Weisberg and his firm took our case and they were the best! Professional, friendly, responded quickly. The Lemon Law applied in our situation and was settled with quick results. we would highly recommend this firm. Pat