Home / The Lemon Law Process / Missouri Lemon Law

Missouri Lemon Law

Missouri Lemon Law State Statutes

Presented By:
LaCroix Law Firm

Educate yourself about the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act (the federal lemon law), the lemon law process and the Missouri lemon law on new cars by reading the Missouri lemon law statute (below) to learn the Missouri lemon law definition and its presumptions. Then, connect with a free Missouri lemon law attorney for any and all help you need under the Missouri car lemon law. CarLemon.com is the only website you’ll ever need, for everything you’ll ever need, under the Missouri automobile lemon law! By the way, the Missouri Attorney General’s Missouri Lemon law Rights Consumer Guide is pretty good, too.

  • Is your vehicle 2010 or newer?
  • Has it been in the shop too many times? Too many days?
We can tell you FAST if you have a Lemon!
Send copies of your repair records to: help@CarLemon.com
or FAX: 866-773-6152
or call 888-595-9111
No Cost. No Obligation.

Missouri Lemon Law Rights

Title XXVI, Chapter 407, Sections 560 – 583

Missouri Lemon Law 407.560 Definitions.

As used in sections 407.560 to 407.579, the following terms mean:

(1) “Collateral charges”, those additional charges to a consumer not directly attributable to a manufacturer’s suggested retail price label for the new motor vehicle. For the purposes of sections 407.560 to 407.579, “collateral charges” includes all sales tax, license fees, registration fees, title fees and motor vehicle inspections;

(2) “Comparable motor vehicle”, an identical or reasonably equivalent motor vehicle;

(3) “Consumer”, the purchaser, other than for the purposes of resale, of a new motor vehicle, primarily used for personal, family, or household purposes, and any person to whom such new motor vehicle is transferred for the same purposes during the duration of an express warranty applicable to such new motor vehicle, and any other person entitled by the terms of such warranty to enforce the obligations of the warranty;

(4) “Express warranty”, any written affirmation of the fact or promise made by a manufacturer to a consumer in connection with the sale of new motor vehicles which relates to the nature of the material or workmanship or will meet a specified level of performance over a specified period of time;

(5) “Manufacturer”, any person engaged in the manufacturing or assembling of new motor vehicles as a regular business;

(6) “New motor vehicle”, any motor vehicle being transferred for the first time from a manufacturer, distributor or new vehicle dealer, which has not been registered or titled in this state or any other state and which is offered for sale, barter or exchange by a dealer who is franchised to sell, barter or exchange that particular make of new motor vehicle. The term “new motor vehicle” shall include only those vehicles propelled by power other than muscular power, but the term shall not include vehicles used as a commercial motor vehicle, off-road vehicles, mopeds, motorcycles or recreational motor vehicles as defined in section 301.010, RSMo, except for the chassis, engine, powertrain and component parts of recreational motor vehicles. The term “new motor vehicle” shall also include demonstrators or lease-purchase vehicles as long as a manufacturer’s warranty was issued as a condition of sale.

Missouri Lemon Law 407.565 Report of nonconformity required.

For the purposes of sections 407.560 to 407.579, if a new motor vehicle does not conform to all applicable express warranties, and the consumer reports the nonconformity to the manufacturer, or its agent, during the term of such express warranties, or during the period of one year following the date of original delivery of the new motor vehicle to the consumer, whichever period expires earlier, the manufacturer, or its agent, shall make such repairs as are necessary to conform the new vehicle to such express warranties, notwithstanding the fact that such repairs are made after the expiration of such term or such one-year period.

Missouri Lemon Law 407.567 Replacement of motor vehicle or refund of purchase price.

(1) If the manufacturer, through its authorized dealer or its agent, cannot conform the new motor vehicle to any applicable express warranty by repairing or correcting any default or condition which impairs the use, market value, or safety of the new motor vehicle to the consumer after a reasonable number of attempts, the manufacturer shall, at its option, either replace the new motor vehicle with a comparable new vehicle acceptable to the consumer, or take title of the vehicle from the consumer and refund to the consumer the full purchase price, including all reasonably incurred collateral charges, less a reasonable allowance for the consumer’s use of the vehicle. The subtraction of a reasonable allowance for use shall apply when either a replacement or refund of the new motor vehicle occurs.

(2) Refunds shall be made to the consumer and lien holder of record, if any, as their interests may appear.

Missouri Lemon Law 407.569 Affirmative defenses.

It shall be an affirmative defense to any claim under sections 407.560 to 407.579 that:

(1) An alleged nonconformity does not substantially impair the use, market value, or safety of the motor vehicle;

(2) A nonconformity is the result of abuse, neglect, or unauthorized modifications or alterations of a motor vehicle;

(3) A claim by a consumer was not filed in good faith; or

(4) Any other affirmative defense allowed by law.

Missouri Lemon Law 407.571 Presumptions of nonconformity.

It shall be presumed that a reasonable number of attempts have been undertaken to conform a new motor vehicle to the applicable express warranties if within the terms, conditions, or limitations of the express warranty, or during the period of one year following the date of original delivery of the new motor vehicle to a consumer, whichever expires earlier, either:

(1) The same nonconformity has been subject to repair four or more times by the manufacturer, or its agents, and such nonconformity continues to exist; or

(2) The new vehicle is out of service by reason of repair of the nonconformity by the manufacturer, through its authorized dealer or its agents, for a cumulative total of thirty or more working days, exclusive of down time for routine maintenance as prescribed by the manufacturer, since delivery of the new vehicle to the consumer. The thirty-day period may be extended by a period of time during which repair services are not available to the consumer because of conditions beyond the control of the manufacturer or its agents.

Missouri Lemon Law 407.573 Warranty extension.

(1) The terms, conditions, or limitations of the express warranty, or the period of one year following the date of original delivery of the new motor vehicle to a consumer, whichever expires earlier, may be extended if the new motor vehicle warranty problem has been reported but has not been repaired by the manufacturer, or its agent, by the expiration of the applicable time period.

(2) The manufacturer shall provide information for consumer complaint remedies with each new motor vehicle. It shall be the responsibility of the consumer, or his representative, prior to availing himself of the provisions of sections 407.560 to 407.579, to give written notification to the manufacturer of the need for the repair of the nonconformity, in order to allow the manufacturer an opportunity to cure the alleged defect. The manufacturer shall immediately notify the consumer of a reasonably accessible repair facility of a franchised new vehicle dealer to conform the new vehicle to the express warranty. After delivery of the new vehicle to an authorized repair facility by the consumer, the manufacturer shall have ten calendar days to conform the new motor vehicle to the express warranty. Upon notification from the consumer that the new vehicle has not been conformed to the express warranty, the manufacturer shall inform the consumer if an informal dispute settlement procedure has been established by the manufacturer in accordance with section 407.575. However, if prior notice by the manufacturer of an informal dispute settlement procedure has been given, no further notice is required.

(3) Any action brought under sections 407.560 to 407.579 shall be commenced within six months following expiration of the terms, conditions, or limitations of the express warranty, or within eighteen months following the date of original delivery of the new motor vehicle to a consumer, whichever is earlier, or, in the event that a consumer resorts to an informal dispute settlement procedure as provided in sections 407.560 to 407.579, within ninety days following the final action of any panel established pursuant to such procedure.

Missouri Lemon Law 407.575 Manufacturer with approved settlement procedure.

If a manufacturer has established an informal dispute settlement procedure which complies in all respects with the provisions of the code of Federal Regulations, 16 C.F.R. 703, provisions of sections 407.560 to 407.579 concerning refunds or replacements shall not apply to any consumer who has not first resorted to such procedure.

Missouri Lemon Law 407.577 Court action by consumer.

(1) If a consumer undertakes a court action after complying with the provisions of sections 407.560 to 407.579 and finally prevails in that action, he shall be allowed by the court to recover as part of the judgment a sum equal to the aggregate amount of costs and expenses, including attorney’s fees based on actual time expended, determined by the court to have been reasonably incurred by the plaintiff for or in connection with the commencement and prosecution of such action.

(2) If any claim by a consumer under sections 407.560 to 407.579 is found by a court to have been filed in bad faith, or solely for the purpose of harassment, or in the absence of a substantial justifiable issue of either law or fact raised by the consumer, or for which the final recovery is not at least ten percent greater than any settlement offer made by the manufacturer prior to the commencement of the court action, then the consumer shall be liable for all costs and reasonable attorney’s fees incurred by the manufacturer, or its agent, as a direct result of the bad faith claim.

Missouri Lemon Law 407.579 Consumer’s right to other remedies.

(1) Except as provided in subdivision (1) of section 407.560, nothing in sections 407.560 to 407.579 shall in any way limit the rights or remedies which are otherwise available to a consumer at law or in equity.

(2) Sections 407.560 to 407.579 shall apply to any new motor vehicle sold after January 1, 1985.

Missouri Lemon Law 407.583 Warranty repairs, labor cost compensation to dealer.

When a dealer makes repairs to any motor vehicle or vessel pursuant to any warranty provision, the dealer shall receive from the manufacturer or distributor giving the warranty, reasonable compensation for labor at a rate no less than that posted by the dealer for labor not under warranty.

Car Lemon Home
Lemon Law Summaries
Lemon Law Statutes

6 comments

  1. Danielle Jones

    I live in Missouri and I purchased a 2006 Nissan Murano and within the 30 days the transmission went out. What are my rights?

  2. My aunt bought a used car from a car lot. Not even a weak after she got it she had to replace the power steering pump. Then her power steering fluid and oil started to leak. Come to find out her racapinion was leaking. Then her transmission went out within a five week period. The dealer refuses to replace any parts. She’s only made one payment shhe doesn’t want the car she doesn’t want her money back but she wants them to take the car back and her not have to pay it off. Its a ford torrus. What should she do

    • When older used cars are purchased w/o a warranty, the lemon law doesn’t apply, and it becomes a game of how else to skin the cat. She may have EFTA or TILA rights attendant to her purchase, and other consumer protection laws may apply to other issues. Have her call us, we’ll give her a thorough consumer rights check up, no cost or obligation just free help.

  3. I bought a used car at an auction in Branson, MO. It broke down, overheated, on the way home (15 miles from the auction). The car belonged to the owner of the auction business and he drove it around as his personal vehicle. I’ve had it at several mechanics trying to get it repaired. Each one tells me it’s something different. The last one told me it was head gaskets and would cost more to fix than the car is worth. I can’t help but think he knew it had this problem when he sold it. He told me at first he would buy it back from me but has since changed his mind. Do I have a case to get my money back?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>