Minnesota Lemon Law
Minnesota Lemon Laws and the federal Lemon Law (the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act) provide for compensation to Minnesota consumers of defective automobiles and trucks and other vehicles and products including motorcycles, RV’s, boats, computers and other consumer appliances and products. To qualify under the Minnesota Lemon Law or the federal Lemon Law, you must generally have a product that suffered multiple repair attempts under the manufacturer’s factory warranty. Lemon Law compensation can include a refund, replacement or cash compensation. If you think you qualify for a Lemon Law, click here for a free Minnesota Lemon Law case review or for an immediate evaluation, simply fax your repair records to 866-773-6152. An experienced Lemon Law attorney will personally review your inquiry and records and quickly contact you for a free consultation.
For other useful Minnesota Lemon Law information, click here to visit the Minnesota State Lemon Laws Statutes and Guide pages. Or just keep reading below for the entire Minnesota Lemon Law, or click here to read the federal lemon law.
Minnesota Lemon Law
Chapter 325F, Section 665
Trade Regulations, Consumer Protection
Products And Sales
Minnesota Lemon Law 325F.665
New motor vehicle warranties; manufacturer's duty to repair, refund, or replace.
Minnesota Lemon Law Subdivision 1
For the purposes of this section, the following terms have the meanings given them:
(a) "consumer" means the purchaser or lessee, other than for
purposes of resale or sublease, of a new motor vehicle used for personal, family, or
household purposes at least 40 percent of the time, a person to whom the new motor
vehicle is transferred for the same purposes during the duration of an express warranty
applicable to the motor vehicle;
(b) "manufacturer" means a person engaged in the business of
manufacturing, assembling or distributing motor vehicles, who will, under normal
business conditions during the year, manufacture, assemble or distribute to dealers at
least ten new motor vehicles;
(c) "manufacturer's express warranty" and "warranty" mean
the written warranty of the manufacturer of a new motor vehicle of its condition and
fitness for use, including any terms or conditions precedent to the enforcement of
obligations under that warranty;
(d) "lease" means a contract in the form of a lease or bailment for
the use of personal property by a natural person for a period of time exceeding four
months, used for personal, family, or household purposes at least 40 percent of the
time, whether or not the lessee has the option to purchase or otherwise become the owner
of the property at the expiration of the lease;
(e) "motor vehicle" means
(1) a passenger automobile as defined in section 168.011, subdivision 7,
including pickup trucks and vans, and
(2) the self-propelled motor vehicle chassis or van portion of recreational
equipment as defined in section 168.011, subdivision 25, which is sold or leased to a
consumer in this state;
(f) "informal dispute settlement mechanism" means an arbitration
process or procedure by which the manufacturer attempts to resolve disputes with
consumers regarding motor vehicle nonconformities and repairs that arise during the
vehicle's warranty period;
(g) "motor vehicle lessor" means a person who holds title to a motor
vehicle leased to a lessee under a written lease agreement or who holds the lessor's
rights under such agreement; and
(h) "early termination costs" means expenses and obligations
incurred by a motor vehicle lessor as a result of an early termination of a written
lease agreement and surrender of a motor vehicle to a manufacturer under subdivision 4,
including penalties for prepayment of finance arrangements.
Minnesota Lemon Law Subdivision 2
Manufacturer's duty to repair.
If a new motor vehicle does not conform to all applicable express warranties, and the
consumer reports the nonconformity to the manufacturer, its agent, or its authorized
dealer during the term of the applicable express warranties or during the period of two
years following the date of original delivery of the new motor vehicle to a consumer,
whichever is the earlier date, the manufacturer, its agent, or its authorized dealer shall
make the repairs necessary to conform the vehicle to the applicable express warranties,
notwithstanding the fact that the repairs are made after the expiration of the warranty
term or the two-year period.
Minnesota Lemon Law Subdivision 3
Manufacturer's duty to refund or replace.
(a) If the manufacturer, its agents, or its authorized dealers are unable to
conform the new motor vehicle to any applicable express warranty by repairing or
correcting any defect or condition which substantially impairs the use or market value
of the motor vehicle to the consumer after a reasonable number of attempts, the
manufacturer shall either replace the new motor vehicle with a comparable motor vehicle
or accept return of the vehicle from the consumer and refund to the consumer the full
purchase price, including the cost of any options or other modifications arranged,
installed, or made by the manufacturer, its agent, or its authorized dealer within 30
days after the date of original delivery, and all other charges including, but not
limited to, sales or excise tax, license fees and registration fees, reimbursement for
towing and rental vehicle expenses incurred by the consumer as a result of the vehicle
being out of service for warranty repair, less a reasonable allowance for the consumer's
use of the vehicle not exceeding ten cents per mile driven or ten percent of the
purchase price, whichever is less. If the manufacturer offers a replacement vehicle
under this section, the consumer has the option of rejecting the replacement vehicle and
requiring the manufacturer to provide a refund. Refunds must be made to the consumer,
and lien holder, if any, as their interests appear on the records of the registrar of
motor vehicles. Refunds shall include the amount stated by the dealer as the trade-in
value of a consumer's used motor vehicle, plus any additional amount paid by the
consumer for the new motor vehicle. A manufacturer must give to the consumer an itemized
statement listing each of the amounts refunded under this section. If the amount of
sales or excise tax refunded is not separately stated, or if the manufacturer does not
apply for a refund of the tax within one year of the return of the motor vehicle, the
department of public safety may refund the tax, as determined under paragraph (h),
directly to the consumer and lien holder, if any, as their interests appear on the
records of the registrar of motor vehicles. A reasonable allowance for use is that
amount directly attributable to use by the consumer and any previous consumer during any
period in which the use and market value of the motor vehicle are not substantially
impaired. It is an affirmative defense to any claim under this section
(1) that an alleged nonconformity does not substantially impair the use or
market value, or
(2) that a nonconformity is the result of abuse, neglect, or unauthorized
modifications or alterations of a motor vehicle by anyone other than the manufacturer,
its agent or its authorized dealer.
(b) It is presumed that a reasonable number of attempts have been undertaken
to conform a new motor vehicle to the applicable express warranties, if
(1) the same nonconformity has been subject to repair four or more times by
the manufacturer, its agents, or its authorized dealers within the applicable express
warranty term or during the period of two years following the date of original
delivery of the new motor vehicle to a consumer, whichever is the earlier date, but
the nonconformity continues to exist, or
(2) the vehicle is out of service by reason of repair for a cumulative total
of 30 or more business days during the term or during the period, whichever is the
(c) If the nonconformity results in a complete failure of the braking or
steering system of the new motor vehicle and is likely to cause death or serious bodily
injury if the vehicle is driven, it is presumed that a reasonable number of attempts
have been undertaken to conform the vehicle to the applicable express warranties if the
nonconformity has been subject to repair at least once by the manufacturer, its agents,
or its authorized dealers within the applicable express warranty term or during the
period of two years following the date of original delivery of the new motor vehicle to
a consumer, whichever is the earlier date, and the nonconformity continues to exist.
(d) The term of an applicable express warranty, the two-year period and the
30-day period shall be extended by any period of time during which repair services are
not available to the consumer because of a war, invasion, strike, or fire, flood, or
other natural disaster.
(e) The presumption contained in paragraph (b) applies against a manufacturer
only if the manufacturer, its agent, or its authorized dealer has received prior written
notification from or on behalf of the consumer at least once and an opportunity to cure
the defect alleged. If the notification is received by the manufacturer's agent or
authorized dealer, the agent or dealer must forward it to the manufacturer by certified
mail, return receipt requested.
(f) The expiration of the time periods set forth in paragraph (b) does not bar
a consumer from receiving a refund or replacement vehicle under paragraph (a) if the
reasonable number of attempts to correct the nonconformity causing the substantial
impairment occur within three years following the date of original delivery of the new
motor vehicle to a consumer, provided the consumer first reported the nonconformity to
the manufacturer, its agent, or its authorized dealer during the term of the applicable
(g) At the time of purchase or lease, the manufacturer must provide directly
to the consumer a written statement on a separate piece of paper, in 10-point all
capital type, in substantially the following form:
"IMPORTANT: IF THIS VEHICLE IS DEFECTIVE, YOU MAY BE ENTITLED UNDER THE
STATE'S LEMON LAW TO REPLACEMENT OF IT OR A REFUND OF ITS PURCHASE PRICE OR YOUR LEASE
PAYMENTS. HOWEVER, TO BE ENTITLED TO REFUND OR REPLACEMENT, YOU MUST FIRST NOTIFY THE
MANUFACTURER, ITS AGENT, OR ITS AUTHORIZED DEALER OF THE PROBLEM IN WRITING AND GIVE
THEM AN OPPORTUNITY TO REPAIR THE VEHICLE. YOU ALSO HAVE A RIGHT TO SUBMIT YOUR CASE
TO THE CONSUMER ARBITRATION PROGRAM WHICH THE MANUFACTURER MUST OFFER IN
(h) The amount of the sales or excise tax to be paid by the manufacturer to
the consumer under paragraph (a) shall be the tax paid by the consumer when the vehicle
was purchased less an amount equal to the tax paid multiplied by a fraction, the
denominator of which is the purchase price of the vehicle and the numerator of which is
the allowance deducted from the refund for the consumer's use of the vehicle.
Minnesota Lemon Law Subdivision 4
Manufacturer's duty to consumers with leased vehicles.
A consumer who leases a new motor vehicle has the same rights against the manufacturer
under this section as a consumer who purchases a new motor vehicle, except that, if it is
determined that the manufacturer must accept return of the consumer's leased vehicle
pursuant to subdivision 3, then the consumer lessee is not entitled to a replacement
vehicle, but is entitled only to a refund as provided in this subdivision. In such a case,
the consumer's leased vehicle shall be returned to the manufacturer and the consumer's
written lease with the motor vehicle lessor must be terminated. The manufacturer shall
then provide the consumer with a full refund of the amount actually paid by the consumer
on the written lease, including all additional charges set forth in subdivision 3, if
actually paid by the consumer, less a reasonable allowance for use by the consumer as set
forth in subdivision 3. The manufacturer shall provide the motor vehicle lessor with a
full refund of the vehicle's original purchase price plus any early termination costs, not
to exceed 15 percent of the vehicle's original purchase price, less the amount actually
paid by the consumer on the written lease.
Minnesota Lemon Law Subdivision 5
Resale or re-lease of returned motor vehicle.
(a) If a motor vehicle has been returned under the provisions of subdivision 3
or a similar statute of another state, whether as the result of a legal action or as the
result of an informal dispute settlement proceeding, it may not be resold or re-leased
in this state unless:
(1) the manufacturer provides the same express warranty it provided to the
original purchaser, except that the term of the warranty need only last for 12,000
miles or 12 months after the date of resale, whichever is earlier; and
(2) the manufacturer provides the consumer with a written statement on a
separate piece of paper, in 10-point all capital type, in substantially the following
"IMPORTANT: THIS VEHICLE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER BECAUSE IT DID NOT
CONFORM TO THE MANUFACTURER'S EXPRESS WARRANTY AND THE NONCONFORMITY WAS NOT CURED
WITHIN A REASONABLE TIME AS PROVIDED BY MINNESOTA LAW."
The provisions of this section apply to the resold or re-leased motor vehicle for
full term of the warranty required under this subdivision.
(b) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (a), if a new motor vehicle
has been returned under the provisions of subdivision 3 or a similar statute of another
state because of a nonconformity resulting in a complete failure of the braking or
steering system of the motor vehicle likely to cause death or serious bodily injury if
the vehicle was driven, the motor vehicle may not be resold in this state.
Minnesota Lemon Law Subdivision 6
Alternative dispute settlement mechanism.
(a) Any manufacturer doing business in this state, entering into franchise
agreements for the sale of its motor vehicles in this state, or offering express
warranties on its motor vehicles sold or distributed for sale in this state shall
operate, or participate in, an informal dispute settlement mechanism located in the
state of Minnesota which complies with the provisions of the Code of Federal
Regulations, title 16, part 703, and the requirements of this section. The provisions of
subdivision 3 concerning refunds or replacement do not apply to a consumer who has not
first used this mechanism before commencing a civil action, unless the manufacturer
allows a consumer to commence an action without first using this mechanism.
(b) An informal dispute settlement mechanism provided for by this section
shall, at the time a request for arbitration is made, provide to the consumer and to
each person who will arbitrate the consumer's dispute, information about this section as
approved and directed by the attorney general, in consultation with interested parties.
The informal dispute settlement mechanism shall permit the parties to present or submit
any arguments based on this section and shall not prohibit or discourage the
consideration of any such arguments.
(c) If, in an informal dispute settlement mechanism, it is decided that a
consumer is entitled to a replacement vehicle or refund under subdivision 3, then any
refund or replacement offered by the manufacturer or selected by a consumer shall
include and itemize all amounts authorized by subdivision 3. If the amount of excise tax
refunded is not separately stated, or if the manufacturer does not apply for a refund of
the tax within one year of the return of the motor vehicle, the department of public
safety may refund the excise tax, as determined under subdivision 3, paragraph (h),
directly to the consumer and lien holder, if any, as their interests appear on the
records of the registrar of motor vehicles.
(d) No documents shall be received by any informal dispute settlement
mechanism unless those documents have been provided to each of the parties in the
dispute at or prior to the mechanism's meeting, with an opportunity for the parties to
comment on the documents either in writing or orally. If a consumer is present during
the informal dispute settlement mechanism's meeting, the consumer may request
postponement of the mechanism's meeting to allow sufficient time to review any documents
presented at the time of the meeting which had not been presented to the consumer prior
to the meeting.
(e) The informal dispute settlement mechanism shall allow each party to appear
and make an oral presentation in the state of Minnesota unless the consumer agrees to
submit the dispute for decision on the basis of documents alone or by telephone, or
unless the party fails to appear for an oral presentation after reasonable prior written
notice. If the consumer agrees to submit the dispute for decision on the basis of
documents alone, then manufacturer or dealer representatives may not participate in the
discussion or decision of the dispute.
(f) Consumers shall be given an adequate opportunity to contest a
manufacturer's assertion that a nonconformity falls within intended specifications for
the vehicle by having the basis of the manufacturer's claim appraised by a technical
expert selected and paid for by the consumer prior to the informal dispute settlement
(g) Where there has been a recent attempt by the manufacturer to repair a
consumer's vehicle, but no response has yet been received by the informal dispute
mechanism from the consumer as to whether the repairs were successfully completed, the
parties must be given the opportunity to present any additional information regarding
the manufacturer's recent repair attempt before any final decision is rendered by the
informal dispute settlement mechanism. This provision shall not prejudice a consumer's
rights under this section.
(h) If the manufacturer knows that a technical service bulletin directly
applies to the specific mechanical problem being disputed by the consumer, then the
manufacturer shall provide the technical service bulletin to the consumer at reasonable
cost. The mechanism shall review any such technical service bulletins submitted by
(i) A consumer may be charged a fee to participate in an informal dispute
settlement mechanism required by this section, but the fee may not exceed the
conciliation court filing fee in the county where the arbitration is conducted.
(j) Any party to the dispute has the right to be represented by an attorney in
an informal dispute settlement mechanism.
(k) The informal dispute settlement mechanism has all the evidence-gathering
powers granted an arbitrator under section 572.14.
(l) A decision issued in an informal dispute settlement mechanism required by
this section may be in writing and signed.
Minnesota Lemon Law Subdivision 7
Effect and admissibility of decision by informal dispute settlement mechanism.
The decision issued in an informal dispute settlement mechanism required by this
section is non-binding on the parties involved, unless otherwise agreed by the parties.
Any party, upon application, may remove the decision to district court for a trial de
novo. If the manufacturer is aggrieved by the decision of the informal dispute settlement
mechanism, an application to remove the decision must be filed in the district court
within 30 days after the date the decision is received by the parties. If the application
to remove is not made within 30 days, then the district court shall, upon application of a
party, issue an order confirming the decision. A written decision issued by an informal
dispute settlement mechanism, and any written findings upon which the decision is based,
are admissible as non-binding evidence in any subsequent legal action and are not subject
to further foundation requirements.
Minnesota Lemon Law Subdivision 8
Treble damages for bad faith appeal of decision.
If the district court finds that a party has removed a decision of an informal dispute
settlement mechanism in bad faith, by asserting a claim or defense that is frivolous and
costly to the other party, or by asserting an unfounded position solely to delay recovery
by the other party, then the court shall award to the prevailing party three times the
actual damages sustained, together with costs and disbursements, including reasonable
Minnesota Lemon Law Subdivision 9
Any consumer injured by a violation of this section may bring a civil action to enforce
this section and recover costs and disbursements, including reasonable attorney's fees
incurred in the civil action. In addition to the remedies provided herein, the attorney
general may bring an action pursuant to section 8.31 against any manufacturer for
violation of this section.
Minnesota Lemon Law Subdivision 10
Limitation on actions.
A civil action brought under this section must be commenced within three years of the
date of original delivery of the new motor vehicle to a consumer; except that, if the
consumer applies to an informal dispute settlement mechanism within three years of the
date of original delivery of a new motor vehicle to a consumer, and if the consumer is
aggrieved by the decision of the informal dispute settlement mechanism, then any civil
action brought under this section must be commenced within six months after the date of
the final decision by the mechanism.
Minnesota Lemon Law Subdivision 11
Nothing in this section limits the rights or remedies which are otherwise available to
a consumer under any other law.
Minnesota Lemon Law Subdivision 12
In addition to any investigative powers authorized by law, the attorney general may
inspect the records of the informal dispute settlement mechanism upon reasonable notice,
during regular business hours, and may make available to the public information about the
operation of the mechanism, but data on an individual may not be disclosed without the
prior consent of the individual.
Minnesota Lemon Law Subdivision 13
Nothing in this section imposes liability on a dealer or creates an additional cause of
action by a consumer against a dealer, except for written express warranties made by the
dealer apart from the manufacturer's warranties. The manufacturer shall not charge back or
require reimbursement by the dealer for any costs, including, but not limited to, any
refunds or vehicle replacements, incurred by the manufacturer arising out of this section,
unless there is evidence that the related repairs had not been carried out by the dealer
in a timely manner or in a manner substantially consistent with the manufacturer's
Car Lemon Home
Lemon Law Summaries
Lemon Law Statutes