Home / The Lemon Law Process / Illinois Lemon Law

Illinois Lemon Law

Illinois Lemon Law State Statutes

Presented By:
Weisberg Consumer Law Group, PA

If you are searching for answers about the Illinois automobile lemon law, CarLemon.com is the place to be! Below you can read the full Illinois lemon law on new cars and learn the presumptions, and here you can read all about the lemon law process generally. Or, skip a few steps and just get free help by connecting with a free Illinois lemon law attorney who will enforce your rights under the the Illinois car lemon law and/or the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, the federal lemon law!

Illinois Lemon Law Rights

  • Is your vehicle 2010 or newer?
  • Has it been in the shop too many times? Too many days?
We can tell you FAST if you have a Lemon!
Send copies of your repair records to: help@CarLemon.com
or FAX: 866-773-6152
or call 888-595-9111
No Cost. No Obligation.
Chapter 815, Section 380
Business Transactions
New Vehicle Buyer Protection Act

Illinois Lemon Law Statute 815.380.1

This Act shall be known and may be cited as the New Vehicle Buyer Protection Act.

Illinois Lemon Law 815.380.2 Definitions.

For the purposes of this Act, the following words have the meanings ascribed to them in this Section.

(a) “Consumer” means an individual who purchases or leases for a period of at least one year a new vehicle from the seller for the purposes of transporting himself and others, as well as their personal property, for primarily personal, household or family purposes.

(b) “Express warranty” has the same meaning, for the purposes of this Act, as it has for the purposes of the Uniform Commercial Code.

(c) “New vehicle” means a passenger car, as defined in Section 1-157 of The Illinois Vehicle Code, a motor vehicle of the Second Division having a weight of under 8,000 pounds, as defined in Section 1-146 of that Code, and a recreational vehicle, except for a camping trailer or travel trailer that does not qualify under the definition of a used motor vehicle, as set forth in Section 1-216 of that Code.

(d) “Nonconformity” refers to a new vehicle’s failure to conform to all express warranties applicable to such vehicle, which failure substantially impairs the use, market value or safety of that vehicle.

(e) “Seller” means the manufacturer of a new vehicle, that manufacturer’s agent or distributor or that manufacturer’s authorized dealer. “Seller” also means, with respect to a new vehicle which is also a modified vehicle, as defined in Section 1-144.1 of The Illinois Vehicle Code, as now or hereafter amended, the person who modified the vehicle and that person’s agent or distributor or that person’s authorized dealer. “Seller” also means, with respect to leased new vehicles, the manufacturer, that manufacturer’s agent or distributor or that manufacturer’s dealer, who transfers the right to possession and use of goods under a lease.

(f) “Statutory warranty period” means the period of one year or 12,000 miles, whichever occurs first after the date of the delivery of a new vehicle to the consumer who purchased or leased it.

(g) “Lease cost” includes deposits, fees, taxes, down payments, periodic payments, and any other amount paid to a seller by a consumer in connection with the lease of a new vehicle.

Illinois Automobile Lemon Law 815.380.3 Failure of vehicle to conform; remedies; presumptions.

(a) If after a reasonable number of attempts the seller is unable to conform the new vehicle to any of its applicable express warranties, the manufacturer shall either provide the consumer with a new vehicle of like model line, if available, or otherwise a comparable motor vehicle as a replacement, or accept the return of the vehicle from the consumer and refund to the consumer the full purchase price or lease cost of the new vehicle, including all collateral charges, less a reasonable allowance for consumer use of the vehicle. For purposes of this Section, “collateral charges” does not include taxes paid by the purchaser on the initial purchase of the new vehicle. The retailer who initially sold the vehicle may file a claim for credit for taxes paid pursuant to the terms of Sections 6, 6a, 6b, and 6c of the Retailers’ Occupation Tax Act. Should the vehicle be converted, modified or altered in a way other than the manufacturer’s original design, the party which performed the conversion or modification shall be liable under the provisions of this Act, provided the part or parts causing the vehicle not to perform according to its warranty were altered or modified.

(b) A presumption that a reasonable number of attempts have been undertaken to conform a new vehicle to its express warranties shall arise where, within the statutory warranty period,

(1) the same nonconformity has been subject to repair by the seller, its agents or authorized dealers during the statutory warranty period, 4 or more times, and such nonconformity continues to exist; or

(2) the vehicle has been out of service by reason of repair of nonconformities for a total of 30 or more business days during the statutory warranty period.

(c) A reasonable allowance for consumer use of a vehicle is that amount directly attributable to the wear and tear incurred by the new vehicle as a result of its having been used prior to the first report of a nonconformity to the seller, and during any subsequent period in which it is not out of service by reason of repair.

(d) The fact that a new vehicle’s failure to conform to an express warranty is the result of abuse, neglect or unauthorized modifications or alterations is an affirmative defense to claims brought under this Act.

(e) The statutory warranty period of a new vehicle shall be suspended for any period of time during which repair services are not available to the consumer because of a war, invasion or strike, or a fire, flood or other natural disaster.

(f) Refunds made pursuant to this Act shall be made to the consumer, and lien holder if any exists, as their respective interests appear.

(g) For the purposes of this Act, a manufacturer sells a new vehicle to a consumer when he provides that consumer with a replacement vehicle pursuant to subsection (a).

(h) In no event shall the presumption herein provided apply against a manufacturer, his agent, distributor or dealer unless the manufacturer has received prior direct written notification from or on behalf of the consumer, and has an opportunity to correct the alleged defect.

Illinois Lemon Law 815.380.4

(a) The provisions of subsection (a) of Section 3 shall not apply unless the consumer has first resorted to an informal settlement procedure applicable to disputes to which that subsection would apply where

(1) The manufacturer of the new vehicle has established such a procedure;

(2) The procedure conforms:

(i) substantially with the provisions of Title 16, Code of Federal Regulation, Part 703, as from time to time amended, and

(ii) to the requirements of subsection (c); and

(3) The consumer has received from the seller adequate written notice of the existence of the procedure. Adequate written notice includes but is not limited to the incorporation of the informal dispute settlement procedure into the terms of the written warranty to which the vehicle does not conform.

(b) If the consumer is dissatisfied with the decision reached in an informal dispute settlement procedure or the results of such a decision, he may bring a civil action to enforce his rights under subsection (a) of Section 3. The decision reached in the informal dispute settlement procedure is admissible in such a civil action. The period of limitations for a civil action to enforce a consumer’s rights or remedies under subsection (a) of Section 3 shall be extended for a period equal to the number of days the subject matter of the civil action was pending in the informal dispute settlement procedure.

(c) A disclosure of the decision in an informal dispute settlement procedure shall include notice to the consumer of the provisions of subsection (b).

Illinois Lemon Law 815.380.5

Persons electing to proceed and settle under this Act shall be barred from a separate cause of action under the Uniform Commercial Code.

Illinois Lemon Law 815.380.6

Any action brought under this Act shall be commenced within eighteen months following the date of original delivery of the motor vehicle to the consumer.

Illinois Lemon Law 815.380.7

The seller who sells a new vehicle to a consumer, shall, upon delivery of that vehicle to the consumer, provide the consumer with a written statement clearly and conspicuously setting forth in full detail the consumer’s rights under subsection (a) of Section 3, and the presumptions created by subsection (b) of that Section.

Illinois Lemon Law 815.380.8

This Act shall apply to motor vehicles beginning with the model year following the effective date of this Act.

Car Lemon Home
Lemon Law Summaries
Lemon Law Statutes


  1. I purchased a new Nissan Pathfinder for 38 Thousand dollars from AutoBarn in Evanston, Il on Friday, May 22, 2015 late in the afternoon. I left the dealership with 31 miles on the odometer. I did not drive the car on Saturday. On Sunday I drove the car for less that 40 miles and the transmission went out. I called the dealership and had the car picked up from where I was stranded on the roadway. I was just told that the car needs a new transmission. I do not want this car. I want the dealer/manufacturer to give me a different and operable auto. What is my recourse at this point.

    Thanks loads,

    Shirley cArney

    • You have to let them fix it, and if they cannot, then the lemon law will apply. Save all repair orders, call us if its in the shop for more than 30 days or 3 or more times for the same problem.

  2. i bought a new 2014 f150 truck (from an IL dealer, I also live in IL) and it has been in the shop 4 times for a low battery indicator coming on. the first time was at 1017 miles, then 1698, 2970 and 3290 miles. each time they tried to fix and i have the dealership paperwork that i was given each time. I bought the truck in nov 14. Would this qualify under the law? also i have things like extended warranty and sprained in bed liner. is the cost of those items reimbursable under the law?

  3. I bought a 2010 gmc Acadia in. November 2014. In January a large tree branch fell on it. It has been to the body shop 7 times and is currently still there a total of about 55 days all together. Should I look for an attorney this is the second time in the shop in less than a week. It was leaking they so called fixed it and now its back for the same thing leaking worse.

  4. Bought a 2014 Ford Focus in February2014. The car has been in the shop 5 times for what Ford says is a transmission problem. They fix it and it may last for days to month and then it starts jerking again. I tried to trade it in and get a different car but it’s not worth anything because the 2014 Focus is known to have Transmission issues. Would this qualify for the Lemon Law.

  5. I bought a used Nissan Ultima ,paid almost 19000. A year later I went to trade it in and they told me it was in a accident and is worth 7000.The dealer I bought it from said it was just traded in,found out he lied,it came from a auction,never told me it was in a accident. The history of the car said there was uni body damage and potentially dangerous and unsafe conditions.Is there anything I can do.?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>